Todas atentas, Chelsea Manning ha sido enviada de nuevo a la carcel!

Imatge
Àmbits Temàtics

Origi­nal publi­ca­tion posted here

The former US army inte­lli­gence analyst Chel­sea Manning has been jailed for refu­sing to testify to a grand jury inves­ti­ga­ting Wiki­Le­aks.

‘I spent seven years figh­ting to survi­ve’: Chel­sea Manning on whist­le­blo­wing and Wiki­Le­aks

 

Read more

US district judge Claude Hilton held Manning in contempt of court and orde­red her jailed on Friday after a brief hearing in Alexan­dria, Virgi­nia, where Manning confir­med she has no inten­tion of testifying. She told the judge she “will accept whate­ver you bring upon me”.

Manning says she is refu­sing to testify because she objects to the secrecy of the grand jury process, and alre­ady reve­a­led everyt­hing she knows at her court martial.

The judge said she will remain jailed until she testi­fies or until the grand jury conclu­des its work.

Manning turned over a vast trove of mili­tary and diplo­ma­tic docu­ments to Wiki­Le­aks, an anti-secrecy website which made them public in 2010. She served seven years of a 35-year mili­tary sentence, and was freed after former presi­dent Barack Obama commu­ted her sentence.

Manning’s lawyers had asked that she be placed under home confi­ne­ment instead of jail, because of medi­cal and safety compli­ca­ti­ons she faces as a trans­gen­der woman.

Her lawyer, Moira Melt­zer-Cohen, called jailing Manning an act of cruelty. She argued Manning’s one-bedroom apart­ment would be suffi­ci­ent confi­ne­ment.

“Obvi­ously prison is a terri­ble place, ” Melt­zer-Cohen said. “I don’t see the purpose to incar­ce­rate people.”

The judge said US mars­hals can handle Manning’s medi­cal care.

In a state­ment before Friday’s hearing, she said she invo­ked her first, fourth and sixth amend­ment protec­ti­ons when she appe­a­red before the grand jury in Alexan­dria on Wednes­day. She said she alre­ady answe­red every subs­tan­tive ques­tion during her 2013 court-martial, and was prepa­red to face the conse­quen­ces of refu­sing to answer again.

“In soli­da­rity with many acti­vists facing the odds, I will stand by my prin­ci­ples. I will exhaust every legal remedy avai­la­ble, ” she said. “My legal team conti­nues to challenge the secrecy of these proce­e­dings, and I am prepa­red to face the conse­quen­ces of my refu­sal.”

Prose­cu­tor Tracy McCor­mick said Manning could easily end her incar­ce­ra­tion by simply follo­wing the law and testifying.

“We hope she chan­ges her mind now, ” McCor­mick said.

Outside the cour­thouse, about 10 protes­ters rallied in support of a figure they call a brave whist­le­blo­wer.

The justice depart­ment has been inves­ti­ga­ting Wiki­Le­aks for some time. Last year, prose­cu­tors in Alexan­dria inad­ver­tently disclo­sed that the Wiki­Le­aks foun­der Julian Assange is facing unspe­ci­fied, sealed crimi­nal char­ges in the district.

Assange has been living in the Ecua­do­rian embassy in London to avoid arrest on contempt of court char­ges in the UK.

Wiki­Le­aks is an impor­tant part of special coun­sel Robert Mueller’s inves­ti­ga­tion into possi­ble Russian medd­ling into the 2016 presi­den­tial elec­tion. Inves­ti­ga­tors are probing whet­her Donald Trump’s campaign knew Russian hackers were going to give Wiki­Le­aks emails stolen from Demo­cra­tic orga­ni­za­ti­ons, inclu­ding presi­den­tial candi­date Hillary Clin­ton’s campaign.

“This is America, 2019: A secret trial against a source for refu­sing to testify against a jour­na­list, ” Wiki­Le­aks twee­ted on Thurs­day in response to news of that Manning was facing a contempt hearing. Most of the hearing was held behind closed doors, but the court was open to the public for the ruling.

Asso­ci­a­ted Press contri­bu­ted to this report