New publication: Counter the Digital Monoculture

Imatge

Origi­nal post here

March 21, 2022

Arthur Stei­ner, Digi­tal Speci­a­list Hivos

The early days of the inter­net were charac­te­ri­zed by idea­lis­tic ambi­ti­ons: it would be a space of extra­or­di­nary free­dom beyond the cons­traints of money or poli­tics. But 25 years later, the situ­a­tion is very diffe­rent. Social media plat­forms such as YouTube, Insta­gram, Twit­ter, and Face­book exer­cise more control over the way we access infor­ma­tion and share know­ledge than any single country. They regu­late and police the speech of milli­ons of people and allow unpre­ce­den­ted levels of disin­for­ma­tion, hate speech and violence to proli­fe­rate. In the regi­ons where Hivos works, for exam­ple, these plat­forms are enabling ever more pola­ri­za­tion and online sexual abuse, and deftly faci­li­tate disin­for­ma­tion campaigns that target LGBTQI+ commu­ni­ties and those who defend their rights.

Greed and capti­va­tion

One of the root causes behind this is the ad-driven busi­ness models of these tech compa­nies. Their plat­forms are desig­ned to gamify our beha­vior, encou­rage consump­tion, and ensure that we stay enga­ged as long as possi­ble. By prio­ri­ti­zing user atten­tion and growth, they have culti­va­ted a uniform digi­tal space domi­na­ted by click­bait, bran­ded content, and influ­en­cer beha­vior. Algo­rithms manage the public debate and often amplify racism, sexism, ableism and homop­ho­bia, crea­ting an atten­tion economy that works against margi­na­li­zed commu­ni­ties. Big Tech is trans­for­ming the digi­tal public sphere into a digi­tal mono­cul­ture, and we need to fight back against this homo­ge­ni­za­tion and commo­di­fi­ca­tion of the digi­tal public sphere.

Cynt­hia Alonso for the Digi­tal Free­dom Fund
 

An alter­na­tive digi­tal sphere

Hivos works towards a vibrant and diverse digi­tal public sphere where people can come toget­her to freely discuss and iden­tify soci­e­tal problems and influ­ence poli­ti­cal action. We support people who imagine and push for just and inclu­sive alter­na­ti­ves to the status quo. They work across civil soci­ety, acade­mia, in the media and the arts. An exam­ple of our work is the Digi­tal Defen­ders Part­ners­hip, which promo­tes an open inter­net, free from thre­ats to expres­sion, asso­ci­a­tion, assembly, privacy, and other funda­men­tal rights. Anot­her exam­ple is the Resource of Open Minds and its Digi­tal Earth fellows­hip which supports sci-fi writers, film­ma­kers, artists and futu­rists who imagine more humane digi­tal futu­res in their docu­men­ta­ries, artwork and rese­arch projects.

Coun­te­ring the digi­tal mono­cul­ture

As part of Digi­tal Earth, we inter­vi­e­wed seven future-orien­ted acti­vists, artists and acade­mics. We asked them, “How can we coun­ter the digi­tal mono­cul­ture?” The inter­vi­ews cover a wide range of topics, from indi­ge­nous futu­rism to afro-femi­nism, specu­la­tive story­te­lling, and the need for a fossil-free inter­net. A recur­ring theme is the impor­tance of amplifying the work of acti­vists, artists, and film­ma­kers to reach wide audi­en­ces with narra­ti­ves that focus on humane digi­tal futu­res. Story­te­lling through film, art and music can involve us all and shake us free from the paraly­zing grip of dysto­pian futu­res presen­ted as inevi­ta­ble. Story­te­lling that inter­we­a­ves a plura­lity of voices and know­ledge can present a formi­da­ble challenge to simplis­tic narra­ti­ves that focus on the privi­le­ged few.

Hivos sees vital oppor­tu­ni­ties to support crea­ti­ves and build alter­na­tive digi­tal spaces and acti­vist commu­ni­ties that will stand up to the digi­tal mono­cul­ture. They are essen­tial if we want to imagine and work towards a more humane and sustai­na­ble digi­tal future.

The inter­vi­ews have been conduc­ted by Arthur Stei­ner, Digi­tal Speci­a­list at Hivos and Anna Sejbaek Torp-Peder­sen, Editor at Digi­tal Earth in 2021.

 

Coun­ter the Digi­tal Mono­cul­ture

 

 

Inter­vi­e­wees & topics

“For me it is a very straight­for­ward ques­tion; if you want to break the digi­tal mono­cul­ture you need to break big tech.”

Spide­ra­lex: Foun­der of the collec­tive Dones­tech

Brea­king the cycle of hope­less­ness

 

 

 

“There is a huge discre­pancy between what people think robots are and should look like and what robots that are success­ful at their job look like.”

Dr Kanta Dihal: Senior Rese­arch Fellow at the Lever­hulme Centre for the Future of Inte­lli­gence, Univer­sity of Cambridge

The white­ness of AI

 

 

 

“We need to have diffe­rent imagi­na­ti­ons of the future or else we’re just going to end up where we are right now. We’re in the future that the US built.”

Neema Iyer: Artist and tech­no­lo­gist, foun­der of Pollicy

Femi­nist tech­no­lo­gies for change

 

 

 

“One of the grea­test tricks the compu­ter science fields ever pulled is using the term ‘sci­en­tists’. They’re not scien­tists.”

Jason Edward Lewis: Digi­tal media theo­rist, poet and soft­ware desig­ner

Main challen­ges of AI

 

 

 

“When I think about the idea of a mono­cul­ture, it’s the energy infras­truc­ture and the inter­net infras­truc­ture merging toget­her”

Miche­lle Thorne: @thor­net, Sustai­na­ble Inter­net Lead at the Mozi­lla Foun­da­tion

Advan­cing a sustai­na­ble inter­net

 

 

 

“If you go to the British Museum or MET Museum, we can see the colo­nial power by simply asking how certain objects even got there. But with digi­tal digi­tal prac­ti­ces, it’s a much more grey or unknown area.”

Morehs­hin Allahyari: Media artist, acti­vist and writer

Digi­tal colo­ni­a­lism

 

 

 

“It would be so easy if we could just take Face­book or Google to court.”

Nani Jansen Revent­low: Award-winning human rights lawyer

Digi­tal rights and stra­te­gic liti­ga­tion

 

 

 

 

 

ᑲᓇᕒᐲᐅᐣ/connor­pion/piih­ko­ni­ke­win mixed non-status urban cree/atimekw/métis/sett­ler living in Tkaronto/Dish with One Spoon Treaty Terri­tory ᐋᐣᒋᓈᑯᐑᐦᐃᑎᓱ/aand­ji­na­a­go­wii­hi­dizo/s/t/h/e/y trans­fi­gure them­sel­ves Digi­tal, 2017