ChatGPT Is Consuming a Staggering Amount of Water

It’s no secret that trai­ning arti­fi­cial inte­lli­gence algo­rithms requi­res insane amounts of energy — but, as a new paper reve­als, it also uses up an absurd amount of water, too.

Rese­ar­chers from the Univer­sity of Cali­for­nia River­side and the Univer­sity of Texas Arling­ton have shared a yet-to-be-peer-revi­e­wed paper titled «Making AI Less Thirsty» that looks into the envi­ron­men­tal impact of AI trai­ning, which not only needs copi­ous of elec­tri­city but also tons of water to cool the data centers.

When looking into how much water is needed to cool the data proces­sing centers employed by compa­nies like OpenAI and Google, the rese­ar­chers found that just in trai­ning GPT-3 alone, Micro­soft, which is part­ne­red with OpenAI, consu­med a whop­ping 185,000 gallons of water — which is, per their calcu­la­ti­ons, equi­va­lent to the amount of water needed to cool a nuclear reac­tor.

As the paper notes, the water Micro­soft used to cool its US-based data centers while trai­ning GPT-3 was enough to produce «370 BMW cars or 320 Tesla elec­tric vehi­cles.» If they’d trai­ned the model in the company’s data centers in Asia, which are even larger, «these numbers would have been tripled.»

Bottle It Up

What’s more: «ChatGPT needs to 'drink’ [the equi­va­lent of] a 500 ml bottle of water for a simple conver­sa­tion of roughly 20–50 ques­ti­ons and answers, » the paper notes. «While a 500ml bottle of water might not seem too much, the total combi­ned water foot­print for infe­rence is still extre­mely large, consi­de­ring ChatGPT’s billi­ons of users.»

When it comes to sugges­ti­ons for what to do about this glaring issue in the face of repe­a­ted warnings of water shor­ta­ges, the rese­ar­chers don’t have all that much in the way of advice.

At the very least, compa­nies like Google and OpenAI «can, and also should, take social respon­si­bi­lity and lead by exam­ple by addres­sing their own water foot­print, » the rese­ar­chers write — a first step in quen­ching AI’s unsla­ka­ble «thirst.»

 

Image: Getty Images / Futu­rism